SEDL Logo

Southwest Educational Development Laboratory



Conclusions and recommendations

The larger literature on knowledge utilization indicates that, to be effective, dissemination and utilization cannot be "tag-on" activities. Rather, D&U concerns must be incorporated into the earliest planning stages of a research study (NCDDR, 1996). The D&U literature also indicates that, when potential users assess information about research outcomes, the credibility and perceived trustworthiness of the source is of paramount importance — and, as the literature on diversity suggests, trustworthiness relates to the capacity to be culturally responsive. The work of increasing the use of research outcomes among diverse consumer populations, then, lies not merely in selecting dissemination media or packaging information to be distributed via those media. The overarching task lies in becoming a "culturally competent" organization, one that knows, listens to, works with, and addresses the needs of its intended audiences; one that reflects the diversity of those audiences in its policies and personnel; and one that involves potential users throughout the research, development, and dissemination process.

The following are some suggestions for working toward cultural competence in terms of organizational structure and policies, research activities, and dissemination and utilization activities. Because little research exists that addresses the processes of dissemination and utilization for minority persons with disabilities, these recommendations must be considered tentative; they are based on a synthesis of understandings about knowledge utilization, on the one hand, and about racial, ethnic, and cultural diversity on the other.

Organizational recommendations

  • Review and adapt organizational purposes and policies to include a commitment to cultural competence. Make this commitment pervasive and long term.
  • Examine recruitment and hiring policies and procedures. Look for the cultural assumptions contained within them and consider the effects of those assumptions on the organization’s staffing choices. Seek ways of diversifying staff. Avoid tokenism.
  • Make sure all staff understand that cultural competence is the responsibility of the entire organization, not only of minority staff members or "special" projects or committees.
  • Seek ways of establishing an active, partnering presence within the community, whether "community" is defined by geography or interest.
  • Build strong, ongoing relationships with a wide variety of intermediaries who have direct access to potential users. Approach these relationships as a partner rather than as a provider. Remember that intermediaries, like targeted users, will need to find the organization, its activities, and its outcomes both relevant and trustworthy.

Research recommendations

  • Ground decisions about research purposes and hypotheses in a thorough knowledge of potential user audiences. Employ a variety of methods to learn about those audiences, including focus groups, surveys, community involvement, input from intermediaries, and ongoing input from potential users themselves.
  • Examine the assumptions inherent in the goals, hypotheses, and methods of the intended research. Ask others to explore those assumptions, particularly people with experience and insight into potential user groups, and representatives from those groups.
  • Explore a variety of research methodologies, seeking to identify approaches that are most likely to yield accurate, in-depth outcomes related to all target audiences. Consider a blend of qualitative and quantitative approaches.
  • Define all variables fully; be cautious about hidden assumptions and/or comparisons with variables in other studies that may be differently or less fully defined.
  • Use sampling techniques that provide for adequate representation among all targeted audiences, and address appropriate subpopulations, not merely broad racial or ethnic categories.
  • Structure data collection activities to assure an appropriate rate of return from all targeted subpopulations. This likely will require a variety of data collection activities that extend beyond traditional mail or telephone surveys, particularly to reach low-income respondents. Take care to assure that interview and other questioning techniques are culturally appropriate. Assure language accessibility via both print and interpreters.
  • In analyzing data, carefully consider within-group as well as between-group differences. Be cautious of making cultural assumptions in data analysis and conclusions.
  • Seek input and feedback — eliciting both formal and informal "reality checks" — from representatives of target audiences in identifying data collection procedures, identifying or developing data collection instruments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions.

Dissemination and utilization recommendations

  • Begin thinking about the task of dissemination and utilization at the earliest stages of the research effort.
  • In learning about potential user groups (see recommendation, above), seek to identify the information sources and media on which they most frequently rely. Consider not only traditional media, such as print and television, but community resources, leaders, and informal "gatekeepers."
  • Use multiple dissemination strategies and media, targeted to specific subpopulations. Never rely on a single approach.
  • In determining what information to disseminate, consider what the potential user will think is important. Labels, titles, and supporting data that are important to funding sources and other researchers often seem completely irrelevant to intermediaries, potential consumers, and their families.
  • Assure that the information to be disseminated is accessible in language, syntax, format, and length; respectful of cultural customs and proprieties; and relevant to potential users’ concerns.
  • Draw as extensively as possible on D&U strategies that provide for personal contact between potential users and persons who can facilitate the use of research outcomes. Use intermediaries: service providers such as independent living centers or rehabilitation service agencies; community resources such as advocacy groups, churches, community centers, and the like; and informal community leaders and resources, including herbalists and healers who apply traditional cultural approaches. Remember that using intermediaries means the intermed iaries themselves become a D&U audience.
  • Seek input and feedback from representatives of target audiences throughout the D&U process.

Top

Copyright ©2004 Southwest Educational Development Laboratory

About SEDL | Contact SEDL | Terms of Use