NCDDR's WORKSHOP for NIDRR Grantees
Conducting Systematic Reviews of Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies to Inform Evidence-Based Practice and Policy
Holiday Inn Capitol, Washington DC
April 25, 2007
Chad Nye, PhD
Professor of Communication Sciences & Disorders
Executive Director, Center for Autism & Related Disabilities (CARD)
University of Central Florida
Herb Turner, PhD
President and Principal Researcher
ANALYTICA, Inc.
Researchers need to use the best available evidence to make recommendations for practitioners and consumers. This workshop explains how research designs other than randomized controlled trials (RCTs) yield evidence that could be included in systematic reviews. A systematic review "strives to comprehensively identify, appraise, and synthesize all the relevant studies on a given topic" (Petticrew & Roberts, 2006, p. 19). Systematic reviews examine the results of multiple studies that fit defined criteria, in order to limit bias and to identify evidence that emerges from the review. Most systematic reviews use criteria that outline a hierarchy of evidence, with the 'gold standard' identified through RCTs. However, much disability and rehabilitation research consists of evidence generated by quasi-experimental designs including single subject designs.
Agenda |
|
8:00-8:30 am |
|
8:30-9:00 am |
Topic Selection and Getting Started
|
9:00-9:45 am |
Systematic Review Process
|
9:45-10:00 am |
Break |
10:00-10:45 am |
|
10:45-11:00 am |
Break |
11:00 am-12:00 pm |
Calculating and Synthesizing Effect Sizes
|
12:00-12:30 pm |
Next Steps: Where do we go from here?
|
Selected Materials
What is an 'Effect Size'? (Coe, 2000)
Effects of parent involvement in isolation or in combination with peer tutoring on student self-concept and mathematics achievement, (Fantuzzo, et al., 1995)

